HB 5077 Ordered printed by the Speaker pursuant to House Rule 12.00A (5).
Presession filed. (at the request of Budget and Management Division, Oregon
Department of Administrative Services) -- Relating to state financial
administration; appropriating money; and declaring an emergency.
1-12 (H) First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Referred to Ways and Means.
5-5 Assigned to Subcommittee On Human Services.
5-12 Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
Returned to Full Committee.
5-17 Work Session held.
5-19 Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.
5-23 Second reading.
5-24 Third reading. Carried by Richardson. Passed.
Ayes, 49; Nays, 10--Barnhart, Boquist, Buckley, Dingfelder, Holvey, Merkley,
Nelson, Shields, Thatcher, Wirth; Excused, 1--Tomei.
Vote explanation(s) filed by Barnhart.
5-25 (S) First reading. Referred to President's desk.
6-2 Referred to Ways and Means.
6-3 Recommendation: Do pass the A-Eng. bill.
Second reading.
6-6 Third reading. Carried by Schrader. Passed.
Ayes, 18; Nays, 10--Atkinson, Ferrioli, George, Kruse, Morrisette,
Prozanski, Starr, B., Starr, C., Walker, Whitsett; Excused, 1--Beyer;
Attending Legislative Business, 1--Brown.
Vote explanation(s) filed by Prozanski.
6-10 (H) Speaker signed.
6-10 (S) President signed.
6-14 (H) Governor signed.
Chapter 212, (2005 Laws): Effective date June 14, 2005.
Recently Senator Morrisette was asked
whether adding new language to a new medical marijuana bill would prevent
the sort of raid that was done by the House in 5077. He said no. We have
testified about this but that is the answer we get. None of us like the
answer, but there it is. Others are certainly free to get other opinions and
find us an answer we like better. You would be a hero. But, it sounds like
if there is some extra money, they (legislators) can get it no matter what
we would have done or could still put it the OMMA. Someone please correct us
if there is new information but that is what we know at the moment.
People are correct that this sort of vulnerability makes none of us feel
better. The Senators working on the new med mj bill all voted no on HB 5077, so
if anyone has language to protect the OMMA from future money raids, we
would appreciate it if you would submit it to the Senators ASAP and see what
they say. Thank you in advance.
Notes and History
Recommend that the members consult with Senator Bill Morrisette to
determine a proper amendment to 5077 to restore the needed funds, or
if that is not possible, then ask them to kill it.
Sens Morrisette and Kruse
both are working to restore funds back to the program and protect them in
the future-there will likely be no return of all of it, but Sen M seems
dedicated to restoring whatever it takes to preserve the program AND pay for
whatever things like 24/7, etc. that are put into SB772.
The entire Senate leadership is aware and concerned about it.
HB5077 has been referred to Ways and Means by Senate President Peter Courtney.
Start your correspondence to
the committee members in the Senate Ways and Means
Committee:
Dr. Alan Bates
Party: D District: 3
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1703
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE., S-305, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: sen.alanbates@state.or.us
Website: http://www.leg.state.or.us/bates
Vice Chair Margeret Carter
Party: D District: 22
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1722
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE., S-311, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: sen.margaretcarter@state.or.us
Website: http://www.leg.state.or.us/carter
Laura Monnes Anderson
Party: D District: 25
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1725
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE., S-310, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: sen.lauriemonnesanderson@state.or.us
Website: http://www.leg.state.or.us/monnesanderson
Co-Chair Kurt Schrader
Party: D District: 20
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1720
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE., S-209, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: sen.kurtschrader@state.or.us
Website: http://www.leg.state.or.us/schrader
Ben Westlund R-27
Party: R District: 27
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1727
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE., S-211, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: sen.benwestlund@state.or.us
Website: http://www.leg.state.or.us/westlund
Jackie Winters R-10
Party: R District: 10
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1710
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE., S-212, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: http://www.leg.state.or.us/winters
Summary:
There has been a terrible bill passed thru the Oregon State House - HB 5077 - which takes
$900,000 from OMMP bank account and puts into general fund. This will bankrupt the
program and eliminate any chance of anything in 772 which requires OMMP expenditures to fail
-AND / OR- it will force a fee raise. Contact the Committee NOW.
Stealing these funds is a short sighted solution to a budget shortfall. In the long run, this will require the program to
seek operating expense money from the general fund. What was a self sufficient program will become a drain on the
taxpayers.
-----Original Message-----
From: HIGGINSON Grant K
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:48 AM
To: REP Buckley
Subject: Re: OMMP Finance information request
Thank you for your inquiry about Oregon Medical Marijuana Program funds. When our registration program started in May 1999, it
was a "first of its kind" and so we worked with program advocates to determine an appropriate fee. Based on an estimate of 500
patients and staffing needs for running a registry, we came up with an annual fee of $150 per patient.
Over the next few years the number of patients increased dramatically and we established a significant cash balance. Because of this,
in July 2003, we reduced fees for renewals and established even lower fees for patients who were low income (on the OR Health Plan, or SSI).
Still our cash balance continued to increase due to increased numbers of registered patients * now over 10,000. So in January
2005, we implemented a new fee schedule of $55 dollars for either an initial application or a renewal, and provide a very reduced fee of $20 for
low income patients.
This fee level can't fully support the program. The rationale behind this reduction was that with these lower fees, our steady operating
costs, and some commitments to special projects (such as a 24/7 verification system), we would end up with a reasonable cash balance at the
end of the 2005-2007 biennium. We would likely have to raise fees again at that time.
We have always told patients that they didn't need to worry about the cash balance because our understanding is that fee programs such as
the OMMP could not be used to subsidize other programs. However, we were recently informed that LFO is planning on utilizing
$900,000 of our existing cash balance to offset other budget priorities. I have attached the relevant LFO document for your review.
The transfer is included in Increased Other Fund Revenues of $3.2 million on page 7, and is spelled out in more detail on page 8.
As I think you already know, the vehicle for making such a fund transfer happen is HB 5077.
If this bill does go through unchanged, we will likely have to raise fees as early as this summer instead of 2007 as planned. Let me know if you
have further questions."
Status:
HB 5077 was passed thru the House and is on its way to the Senate, contact your rep TODAY.
Rally planned for Wed., June 1st, 10am, see Action, below.
Continue to Educate your House rep anyway as a "closure" strategy and to prepare for the next
time they do this.
Lets get "How They Voted" developed like at > http://mercycenters.org/vote_OR.htm.
Send us your info -or- post to your respective lists (like DPFOR).
Ayes, 49; Nays, 10--Barnhart, Boquist, Buckley, Dingfelder, Holvey, Merkley, Nelson, Shields, Thatcher, Wirth; Excused, 1--Tomei.
Please write your legislator who voted no and say thanks.
KINK, 102 FM in Portland had a brief story about the bill on at 7am today. It included a passionate argument made Representative Buckley on the House floor.
This kind of vote sends a clear signal to the Senate that there are problems with this bill. Please continue to follow up with your senators
thanks,
Lee Berger,
Portland
lelandberger@comcast.net
Now, on to the Senate!
Same action plan - see talking points (in ANALYSIS section) and call,
email, write and visit the reps.
This is one "voting" you can & should do early and often.
Our hope is to focus displeasure over that part so that we may get it
reconsidered. It may get amended in the Senate, but it would require that the Speaker agree
that the OMMP part is a problem.
CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS NOW!! KILL HB 5077 - THIS IS NO JOKE!! Make sure everyone in
that building gets piles of messages - We, the people, are screwed if this passes. STEALING MONEY FROM SICK PEOPLE, CRIPPLED
PEOPLE AND DYING PEOPLE IS CRIMINAL. ACT NOW!! CALL, WRITE, EMAIL POLITE FORCEFUL
COMMUNICATIONS TO THE LEGISLATURE NOW!!
Contacts: Use these links help with contacting state reps:
(Find Your Legislator)
(write your legislator)
For examples:
Senate President
Senator Peter Courtney (D)
D-Salem/
Gervais/Woodburn
District: 11
900 Court St. NE
S-203
Salem, OR 97301
Phone: 503-986-1600
FAX: 503-986-1004
eMail: courtney.sen@state.or.us
|
or
Human Services Subcommittee Members. Such as:
Senator Laurie Monnes-Anderson (D)
District 25
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1725
Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-310
Salem, OR 97301
E-Mail: sen.lauriemonnes-anderson@state.or.us
|
Or Patient friendly -
Senator Bill Morrisette (D)
District 6
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1706
Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-306
Salem, OR 97301
E-Mail: sen.billmorrisette@state.or.us
|
Senator Alan Bates
District 3
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1703
Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-305
Salem, OR 97301
E-Mail: sen.alanbates@state.or.us
|
other Action Items and Contacts
Calling all Patients, Caregivers and OMMP Advocates!
The OMMP is being robbed of its registration fee surplus funds. There is
over a million dollars in the OMMP Budget right now and the Joint
Ways and Means Committee is trying to take $900,000 of it, calling an
"emergency!" This will cause program fees to go back up!
There is a call for a peaceful rally to show discontent with
HB 5077.
The rally will be at the Oregon State Capitol on the front steps on Wednesday,
June 1st, 2005 at 10:00 am. Press releases are being sent out and there is
hope of gaining positive media coverage at the event.
There will have signs available, speakers (TBA), and a STRONG VOICE as a
GROUP to object to HB5077. Join it.
Please dress conservatively (you represent all those that couldn't make it. You're their rep!),
keep in mind that this is a peaceful, non-smoking rally - and remember your sunscreen and
bumpershoots.
There is also a hearing on Senate Bill 772 scheduled for Wednesday in the
afternoon.
Social gathering to follow at Lefty's Pizzeria on State Street in Salem. Time: TBA
Your presence is necessary! We need to stop this bad legislation
from happening! If you need a ride from the Portland area, you can
meet up at Pho's between 8:15 am-8:40 am, (traffic!!) but please contact
Schorts or Big Stevo first to confirm your spot!
Spread the word! Click here for flyer.
For more info visit: http://oregongreenfree.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=5622
Or http://oregongreenfree.com/forums/index.php?act=calendar&code=showevent&eventid=97
Hi DPFOR:
Michelle Cole of the Oregonian Capitol Bureau interviewed me (and hopefully
others) about HB 5077. I told her one consequence of HB 5077 may be the fees
going back up in the near future. Dr. Higginson said the same thing in his
letter to Rep Buckley.
Ms. Cole called me back today and asked:
1. Is there a patient she could talk to who might be affected by the raising
back of the fees back up to $100 to $150? She would like to add an human
story to all the math, I think. I told her some patients may not be able to
register because of the possible extra $100. Is that true?
Contact her at:
Phone 503-221-8234, 503-370-3649 (fax) and email
michellecole@news.oregonian.com.
2. Is there going to be a rally at the Capitol?
(See Action Items). I told her that I would put her two questions to a forum and ask anyone who
wanted to talk to Ms. Cole contact her directly. Contact her if you want to talk to her about the above
questions related to HB 5077.
She said she will publish the story "soon" about HB 5077. Thanks for everyone's
support in trying to stop or amend HB 5077.
Rick Bayer
Portland
ricbayer@comcast.net
See Media Notes, below.
Thanks to all for your continued help. We do have good chance of changing this bill. Education is needed and we may first
have a chance in the Senate after the bill comes from the house. If the Senate education effort succeeds and they amend the bill,
it will most likely be resubmitted to a floor vote to approve the changes. If the education process is working theamendments we may
get in the Senate will be approved in the House.
We want our rep and senator to vote NO on HB 5077 so the OMMP is not forced into a fee increase simply to operate. The LFO report
is based on faulty assumptions that were discussed in yesterday's letter.
Suggestions on the best next step? An OMMA advocate, after consideration and counsel, left a message with state narcotics officer
Durbin that *our* 24/7 permit verification system is in peril if HB 5077 passes as is. So, LE should know that passing HB 5077 is not
going to help any movement toward the 24/7 permit verification they testify that they seek.
OMMA proponents should stop HB 5077 or try an amendment to exclude the OMMP. We also need to
recruit help from our legislators and find out what is going on here.
The alternative of inaction or hesitation with a possible floor vote tomorrow means we may lose $900,000 in patient fees without even trying to
contact our legislators and educate them that something funny is going on. If HB 5077 passes the House and Senate, then we need
Gov K to veto it so good luck to us. The suggestion from several is we contact our legislators now and try to educate them.
It would be nice to have a couple of weeks, some subcommittee hearings that we know about in advance, and more information before
we act; but we don't. Instead, it appears we have a deadline that started yesterday. The vote will occur sooner this coming
week if we are not so lucky and later (and later) if we are more fortunate. That is why some of us are so concerned.
Everyone please write his her representative this weekend and tell all your friends and family to please do the same.
Ideally, we may get this sneaky legislative black bag job out into the light of day and educate everyone. Until then, we have to do our
best. We have to weigh the risk of acting on incomplete information already gathered versus the risk of doing nothing. The
risk of doing nothing is a nearly guaranteed $.9 million theft of patient fees with transfer to general fund according to Dr. Higginson and verified
verbally by the legislative fiscal office.
It's uncertain if we can stop HB 5077 but if we value the OMMP we should do our best. The resultant eventual return of the fee
increase if HB 5077 passes will hurt those can afford it least. Please help keep the program affordable, encourage people to register,
and keep medical marijuana patients from being arrested.
Any other thoughts? Let's make sure we contact every rep and senator in the state ASAP.
Thank you.
FAQS
Q: Is stealing the OMMP funds the only thing in the bill or is that one of many
provisions designed to balance the budget?
A: 5077 rebalances the entire DHS budget and OMMP funds are only a part of the
reshuffle. Most folks in the building were not aware that 5077 did any
specific thing other than shuffle funds - activists are fairly certain, for example,
there was not an amendment which said "and we steal 900 G's from the
marijuana guys"
But it is specifically punishing this class of citizens none the less.
Q: How did it get here?
A: Regarding the time line of HB5077, it was introduced at the same time as
most of the 5000 series budget bills and like them was blank-
Q: Will there be hearings like the ones for 772 at which time we can state our position?
Somebody behind closed doors has had the attention of that committee, can we suggest amendments to the legislation?
A: There *already* was a public hearing in the Human Services subcommittee of the Joint Ways and Means committee. They passed
it out with a "do pass" recommendation. It is now going to go to a floor vote in the House and floor vote in the Senate.
Q: At the beginning of this legislative session and the start of the Alliance Meetings many people myself included and most definately
MERCY were running searches for all bills or activity in Salem that pertained to the OMMP, MJ, or Hemp.
I believe that MERCY at one point had 7 different bills that in one way or another had some direct or indirect effect on MMJ or Hemp and none
of them were 5077......
Anyone have any idea how it was kept off the radar when it supposedly started out in January?
A: This is something that DHS does every session and
sometimes between sessions, reallocations of funds.
This bill and apparently all of the revenue bills
we've learned, are left blank 'til they can figure out
what the tax revenues are going to be for the
biennium. It is believed the source of HB5077 is the head
of DHS, keen to see the big programs stay funded as
much as possible. And as far as they or any one in
their fiscal department would be concerned it would be
the "dollars on account" numbers and where are they
needed. It seems apparent what someone there thinks
of the OMMP!
For example, Independent Living Centers. They are funded by
Federal and State tax funds and any grants they can
get funded. Two sessions ago they granted and then
took away monies dedicated to some low cost grassroot
start-up IL centers. Several centers were
hard hit and were forced to do major rethinking of how
to provide the same services with out any of this
money until next session, maybe, when DHS could
allocate more money.
Due to the budget cuts we've seen over the years since
the implementation of Measure 5 (talk about people
voting against thier own best interests) the
non-cost-effective programs that served the most
people - you know the greater good and all - were always
able to go to the head of DHS with their woes and have
been able to get money reallocated so their
inefficient yet totally indespensible programs could
stay afloat.
--- Some FACTs ---
OMMP would still exist if HB 5077 passes; it is just likely the OMMP patient fees will go back up or we will have no 24/7 permit verification or
both. Will we lose staff? Longer turnaround times? Who knows? Whatever happens, rest assured it will
have the hardest impact on the poorest among us.
If you read the legislation, you will see how nonspecific the information is. There is a mysterious "legislative fiscal office" analysis
that targets OMMP. We are trying to get this information and have contacted legislators to ask for a report from OMMP. That
report is pending and the fiscal analysis is pending.
See also
"MEDICAL MARIJUANA PROVIDES OREGON WITH BADLY NEEDED CASH" at:
http://www.mapinc.org/media/81
and "Milton Friedman and 500+ Economists Call for Marijuana Regulation Debate as New Report Estimates Savings
New Report Projects $10-14 Billion Annual Savings and Revenues."
"In a report released today (June 2, 2005), Dr. Jeffrey Miron, visiting professor of economics at Harvard University, estimates
that replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation similar to that used for alcoholic beverages would
produce combined savings and tax revenues of between $10 billion and $14 billion per year. In response, a group of more
than 500 distinguished economists -- led by Nobel Prize-winner Dr. Milton Friedman -- released an open letter to President
Bush and other public officials calling for "an open and honest debate about marijuana prohibition," adding, "We believe such a
debate will favor a regime in which marijuana is legal but taxed and regulated like other goods."
Click here >> to see more.
HISTORY
01/12 (H)
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
01/12 (H)
Referred to Ways and Means.
05/05 (H)
Assigned to Subcommittee On Human Services.
05/12 (H)
Public Hearing held.
05/12 (H)
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
05/12 (H)
Returned to Full Committee.
05/17 (H)
Work Session held.
The flesh of budget bill only starts to be applied when the W+M committee
starts work in earnest, which was in May. The events at the hearings can be
found out about online.
The first word of the contents to be of 5077 to an activist in the medical cannabis community
on Tuesday 5/17 afternoon late and relayed the actions of the Ways and Means that day.
Activists spent Wednesday on the phone with various legislative offices and staffers trying to
track down where the bill really went. There was some confusion on
Wednesday with Leg Fiscal Office mistakenly telling them it went back to
the Speaker's desk for reassignment to the House Budget Committee. They initiated
contacts with several folks on the committee including Rep March and Richardson.
Thursday a.m. the activist community reps contacted the Legislative Reps again - which
included Rep Buckley (a friendly) - who responded with a request for info on the fees and
balance which
was forwarded to OMMP for the info about noon. In early pm activists called the
Speaker's office to track down HB5077 and found out it was scheduled for floor debate on
Monday (5/23) probably but maybe later. Because of that, there was no chance to amend
the bill in
a committee before that action so the kill call
was sent out.
The Senate may provide a chance to amend, but it would take convincing
Sen. Courtney to refer it to the Senate Budget committee. Then it would have to
go to a reconciliation committee to make both bills agree - and we have little
control over how that would occur - simplest way would be to simply eliminate
any Senate amendment - and they like simple towards this end of the session.
Otherwise it is going to take either a down vote or a veto to stop it. Activists
have contacted several staffers in the Gov. K's office including the Human
Resources advisor, the Legislative Liaison Office and the Gov's personal
assistant and sent the exchange with Richardson. The reply back from Humans
Resource advisor was that they were "aware of this bill and we have been
tracking its progress)- a certainly neutral, factual answer. We will try
to keep everyone posted as we find out more regarding their view of the affair.
Details:
The text of HB5077 is in PDF at:
http://www.leg.state.or.us/05reg/measpdf/hb5000.dir/hb5077.intro.pdf
or in html at:
http://www.leg.state.or.us/05reg/measures/hb5000.dir/hb5077.intro.html
More links to Text follows (see below). Note that it declares an emergency so that it
can go into almost immediate effect.
To find Bills ONLINE - Go Bills and Laws web page
( http://www.leg.state.or.us/cgi-bin/searchMeas.pl ), then to measure text, then to Search
for Specific Measure Number. In this case type in hb 5700 where needed-bingo!
Text link and history link-history is not up to date. TIP: All budget bills are
numbered 5000+
ANALYSIS
It means the demise of 24/7 and the demise of reduced fees. Stated differently, if this
bill passes, we will lose the fee reduction and delay the implementation of 24/7.
Make no mistake, this is war on the poorest and most dis-advantaged class of sick and dying
people in Oregon. Ask your representative and senator to stop HB 5077.
For what it is worth, in 2003 with 4700 patients we were able to make every call to some
offices for some days be about last session's bad bill - HB2939. There are 10,000 of us
now and if that building has anything but killing this on their mind after about Tuesday next,
it better not be our fault.
Call, write, email, visit and do it again. And again.
Here are a couple of talking points. Others can add more and improve the language.
1. The large budget cash surplus is a managerial mistake made by a previous OMMP manager who recently left the program. Patients
should not be penalized for an error by OMMP management. Patients should not be penalized by losing surplus fees to the general
fund because OMMP delayed fee lowering thus allowing this large balance of patient fee money to accumulate.
2. After OMMP was reminded of the cash surplus by patients, a fee lowering finally began in January 2005 with plans to lower the cash balance
to minimum necessary operating levels over 24 months. We are part-way through this process. In addition, money has been
verbally budgeted toward a 24/7 OMMP stand-alone query-only permit verification network. Both OMMA advocates and law
enforcement reached consensus that a 24/7 system is a good idea and have testified to this effect in the Senate. But, HB 5077 puts
any consensus plans in jeopardy.
In other words, it is unfair to transfer 90% (or any %) of patient fees temporarily residing in the cash balance to the general fund. Not
only should this money be returned to patients and spent on patients through lower fees and better services but this "cash balance" is already
spent. Any raid on this temporary surplus must be stopped and therefore HB 5077 should be voted down.
MANY, Many thanx to those who contributed to this info! We beg for comments and any
info any others may have.
LTL (Letters-To-yer-Legislator) Examples -
Example #A
Kill HB5077!
Dear Senator Courtney,
Please keep HB5077 on your desk! It is a bad bill,
using a short sighted, one time solution to a
continuing biennial problem of funding DHS and all
general fund supported services. It appears to be an
under handed attempt to take $900,000 in fees
collected by Oregon's Medical Marijuana Program to
fund taxpayer/general fund mandated DHS programs.
Reallocating these fees, paid by some of Oregon's most
vulnerable patients, is tantamount to theft.
HB5077 will cripple the advances to OMMA proposed by
DHS in SB772, meant to help make brighter lines for
Law Enforcement. HB5077 will make LE's job of trying
to control illicit marijuana more difficult. Things
like, a computer system for 24x7/365 verification of
enrollment in the OMMP and others improvements making
it easier and safer for patients to access and use the
medicine that makes their quality of life worth living
will probably not come to pass either. HB5077 will
drive up the cost of fees paid by registrants, which
were recently lowered a second time to a most
reasonable rate, designed to not raise excess funds.
This money was generated from fees higher than were
needed to fund the program prior to current enrollment
levels. These funds should have been refunded or used
for the advantage of the patients enrolled in the
program. Instead, because of a mean spirited
administration of the program it was bankrolled and
saved for ill-defined purposes. Now those purposes
seem to be defined with HB5077, cripple the Oregon
Medical Marijuana Program by taking its funds! No
funds, no program!
If the Republican leadership in the House wants to
fund DHS services or anything else with money
collected from the use of marijuana perhaps they
should get real and talk about taxation and regulation
of cannabis for the 21+ year old public? We already
use tobacco, alcohol and gambling money to fund many
indispensable programs and services, why not step up
and change the paradigm? Less than 10,000 mostly
low-income, many eligible for OHP people, paying
$150/year accumulated the money wanted by HB5077.
Fees taken from sick people to pay the wages of
healthy people, a novel concept! Now, in our
continuing times of low tax receipts and this States
lack of fair taxation, we are looking at taking money
raised by sick people and their LEGAL use of marijuana
for what purpose in DHS we don't exactly know.
Again this is a short sighted, one time solution to an
ongoing problem with under funding of DHS due to
excessive tax break concessions to groups that pay few
if any taxes to do business in this state! Never again
will we raise almost a million dollars in this program
to be siphoned off when the account gets ripe again!
Please, stop HB5077!
Sincerely,
X. Xxxx Xxxxx
|
Example #1
Dear Senator-
In as much as hb 5077 will gut the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program bank account, and
eliminate the ability of the program to provide functions now being written into possible
statute in SB 772, its passage would be a great tragedy for those dependent upon the OMMP,
as well as those in law enforcement who need certain likely provisions in SB 772.
Please act on the clear knowledge of the damage to the OMMP which 5077 would inflict and
refuse support for it.
I look forward to hearing your feelings about this very concerning matter and would hope that
you would join with the important effort to make sure, one way or another, that 5077 does not
inflict this damage to this important program.
Sincerely,
Xxxxx Xxxx
|
Example #2
Dear Senator-
I would ask that you review your view that OMMP patients are suffering mere heartburn. It is no exaggeration to say that passing
5077 in its current form will defund the OMMP and likely cause it to cease functioning. Such a thing will result in people who are
crippled, severely ill or terminally ill being deprived of the program's protection and thus the ability to use the medicine which allows them to
live and function. None of them are suffering heartburn.
You will likely be in a position to understand more of the importance of this program to Oregonians over the next few days. Please
listen to those people who will be contacting you and your colleagues soon. Their life depends on it.
Sincerely,
Xxxxx
|
Example #3
Dear Senator-
I am writing in great concern about hb 5077, referred by Ways and Means yesterday to the speaker and eventually on to the budget committee
and probably your subcommittee, thus this note.
Fiscal office referred to this bill as the Human Resources Rebalance Bill and the part which concerns me, and every other registrant with the
Oregon Medical Marijuana Program is that is that it contemplates taking almost 900,000 dollars from the OMMP bank account (over 90% of it!)
and putting it into the general fund. This money has accumulated in that account from the fees and only the fees paid by OMMP
registrants to run the program. It was realized last year that the account surplus would allow a lower registration fee and a new fee was
set which would allow, by the end of the next biennium, the balance to be reduced to a much more modest level as some of the balance was
used up by costs. There are several planned uses for the remaining parts of this fund, some of which are being written into statute in
SB 772 this session and these planned uses are crucial to the successful future operation of the OMMP. These funds are being
counted on to fund these operations ! And if the bank balance is raided to any significant extent then these programs planned will not
be funded, to the serious detriment of all parties concerned with the OMMP, law enforcement included.
I do indeed realize that Oregon has a fiscal problem currently, but to attempt to solve it by stealing funds from sick, crippled and dying patients
is appallingly inappropriate. These funds ARE NOT public funds and have never been in the general fund, but have been produced
by OMMP registrants for the OMMP use. OMMP registrants have historically felt very protective of this program and its funds and
will, I assure you be outraged at this yet not public news, and will certainly respond with a significantly attention getting manner if this effort
goes anywhere but to the trash.
I ask you sincerely to stop this bill and make a stand for fiscal responsibility and honorable action. When the people told the
government to live within its means and not expect new taxes, it most certainly did not contemplate that the state would respond by stealing
money which never belonged to it, from sick, crippled and dying persons to whom it does belong. I look forward to your response and
help in stopping this bill. Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Xxxxx Xxxx
503-555-0420
|
Example #4
Dear Senator-
Thank you for your hard work in trying to balance the state's budget. But is this true
what I am hearing? Is the OMMP being raided to balance the budget? You should not
let this happen. It will be taking funds from one of the only programs that has been
paying its own way. HB 5077's grab at the OMMP funds will stop or delay the fee
reduction that is planned to continue for the next two years and victimize some of Oregon's
poorest citizens (a large number of patients on the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program exist on
government disability checks). It will also delay or preclude from happening some of the
changes that are in the works in SB 772 that are backed by both law enforcement and patients.
Please reconsider this reassignment of funds. Patients should not be punished because
other programs and departments are not as successful as the OMMP.
Thank you for your time,
Xxxxxx Xxxx
NE Portland
|
Example #5
This just in from Rep Buckley's office. Now we can make sense to those who ask. You can supply this public info to all concerned.
----- Message -----
From: "Rep Buckley" >
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:21 AM
Subject: FW: OMMP Finance information request
-----Original Message-----
From: HIGGINSON Grant K
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:48 AM
To: REP Buckley
Subject: Re: OMMP Finance information request
Thank you for your inquiry about Oregon Medical Marijuana Program funds. When our registration program started in May 1999, it
was a "first of its kind" and so we worked with program advocates to determine an appropriate fee. Based on an estimate of 500
patients and staffing needs for running a registry, we came up with an annual fee of $150 per patient.
Over the next few years the number of patients increased dramatically and we established a significant cash balance. Because of this,
in July 2003, we reduced fees for renewals and established even lower fees for patients who were low income (on the OR Health Plan, or SSI).
Still our cash balance continued to increase due to increased numbers of registered patients * now over 10,000. So in January
2005, we implemented a new fee schedule of $55 dollars for either an initial application or a renewal, and provide a very reduced fee of $20 for
low income patients.
This fee level can't fully support the program. The rationale behind this reduction was that with these lower fees, our steady operating
costs, and some commitments to special projects (such as a 24/7 verification system), we would end up with a reasonable cash balance at the
end of the 2005-2007 biennium. We would likely have to raise fees again at that time.
We have always told patients that they didn't need to worry about the cash balance because our understanding is that fee programs such as
the OMMP could not be used to subsidize other programs. However, we were recently informed that LFO is planning on utilizing
$900,000 of our existing cash balance to offset other budget priorities. I have attached the relevant LFO document for your review.
The transfer is included in Increased Other Fund Revenues of $3.2 million on page 7, and is spelled out in more detail on page 8.
As I think you already know, the vehicle for making such a fund transfer happen is HB 5077.
If this bill does go through unchanged, we will likely have to raise fees as early as this summer instead of 2007 as planned. Let me know if you
have further questions.
|
Example #6
Representative Mark Hass
Dear Mark:
Hope all is well with you. We are fortunate to have you to represent us. OnTuesday May 17, I was alerted about HB 5077 by
a senior DHS official, toldit had passed Ways and Means committee, and that it may be scheduled for aHouse floor vote as soon as this coming
week. This was verified by theSpeaker's office.
HB 5077, called by the legislative fiscal office the "Human Resources Rebalance Bill" is a bill to extract money from existing cash balances in
state programs.
Attached is the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program (OMMP) financial report as of 31 December 2004. It is in PDF and was scanned
using updated Norton anti-virus. This may help you know what HB 5077 and the fiscal office is targeting. Look for "Cash
Balance Ending" at the bottom with the value around $1 million. I am told that HB 5077 would remove about 90% or $.9 million or
$900,000 of those patient fees and transfer the money to the general fund leaving very little remaining.
The arguments against this transfer from OMMP cash balance to general funds include:
1. OMMP is a fee-based program funded only by patient fees and has never cost received money from the general fund. The OMMP
cash surplus is a managerial mistake made by a previous OMMP manager who recently left the program (Mary Leverette). Patients
should not be penalized for an error by OMMP management. Patients should not be penalized by losing their surplus fees to the
general fund. OMMP delayed fee lowering and in essence "overcharged" while this cash balance ballooned without patients being notified.
2. After patients (I serve on an OMMP advisory committee) demanded fiscal responsibility, a public financial report finally emerged that you
find attached. Patients again had to push OMMP very hard for fee reductions. After Dr. Higginson, state health officer, brought in a
budget specialist, a significant fee lowering finally began in January 2005 with an overall strategy to lower the cash balance to minimum
necessary operating levels over 24 months. We are part-way through this process. In addition, money has been verbally budgeted
toward a 24/7 OMMP stand-alone query-only permit verification network. Both OMMA advocates and law enforcement reached
consensus that a 24/7 permit verification system is a good idea and have testified to this effect in the Senate (SB 772). With HB 5077
unamended to exclude OMMP, patients and law enforcement may lose the verification tool they have seeking since the OMMA started - a
rapid 24/7 permit verification.
3. Because of the transfer to the general fund, this has the appearance of an unfair tax targeting the sick and disabled - these
chronically ill persons are least likely to have the financial means to pay higher fees and taxes. HB 5077 will almost certainly mandate a
raised OMMP fee in the near future. The annual fee was $150 when the surplus accumulated. Now it is down to $55 (except $20 for
those on Oregon Health Plan or SSI). When the fees goes back up, many patients will be unable to register and be subject to arrest
again.
4. As patients are unable to register, many more will be processed through our courts after being arrested for personal gardens, to
which law enforcement is particularly unsympathetic in Washington County. Any money "found" by the legislature through theft
from patients now will probably be spent many times over in the criminal justice system spending $100,000 per medical marijuana court case.
Why make the OMMP less affordable so we can bust patients and expensively process, try, and even jail them? Leaving the
money in the OMMP will most likely allow the lower fees thus encouraging more patients to register to avoid arrest and the expense and
emotional trauma that result. OMMP saves taxpayer money because court is expensive and OMMP is supported by patient fees.
So in the short run the state may get a few hundred thousand only to lose millions by arresting and trying patients (especially our
Washington County Sheriff's office).
In summary, it is unfair to transfer 90% (or any %) of patient fees temporarily residing in the cash balance to the general fund. Not
only should this money be returned to patients through lower fees or better services but this "cash balance" is already spent. Any
raid on this temporary OMMP surplus must be stopped because it will put OMMP at risk. Therefore HB 5077 should be voted down
or at a minimum amended to exclude OMMP. But either way, patients should not bear this theft of excessive fees charged by OMMP.
Please contact me for any questions. We did not know about this until recently and are busily collecting more information, so my
apologies for the late notice. Representative Buckley has contacted Dr. Higginson for a more thorough explanation on what is going
on with DHS - and we are awaiting that. I will forward that if when it is available. HB 5077 is cryptic but could be very
damaging if what we are told through the legislative fiscal office and by a senior DHS official is true. This bill has the appearance of a
sneaky effort without a real public hearing that involved real stakeholders. Any enlightenment you could provide and any help
getting more information from Dr. Higginson at DHS or the legislative fiscal office would be appreciated.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Xxxx Xxxxx
|
Example #7
--- WHAT THEY SAY ----
Response from Representative Deborah Boone
Thanks for your input. I was not aware of this either but the bill was voted
on in the House today. I voted for the bill because the DHS budget is very
large and encompasses many program components. I am sorry that your program was
changed. It is one of many changes made by the committee before I was named to
it.
This is an auto response......Thank you for emailing
the office of Oregon State Representative Greg Smith.
Please know that while in Legislative Session,
Representative Smith is very busy with his Committee
schedules, however, never too busy to hear from folks
in his district! Please be assured that Representative
Smith reads all emails. While it may take a few days
for Representative Smith to respond, please know that
we value your input and encourage you to keep writing!
Truly yours,
Bev Denison
Legislative Director
Subject: RE: SB 772-2-HB5077-OMMP
Date: May 26, 2005 2:34 PM
Thank you very much for taking time to write to me. I
appreciate your interest in the process of setting
government policy. Regarding the bill to which you
refer: I will be considering your comments as well as
the comments of others in the review process. I will
copy your response and add it to my bill file, which I
will use when the bill is heard. Thank you again for
your input.
Warm Regards,
Representative Linda Flores
Response from Representative Karen Minnis
Thank you for forwarding the info about OMMP budget. As it states in the Legislative Fiscal Analysis of DHS that you attached, the
$900,000 ending balance in the Medical Marijuana fees account, as well as the other 2 "Other Funds" accounts are not dedicated in statute,
therefore they can be used for other purposes.
Although this may not be the most desired approach, legislators are working hard to balance the DHS budget for 2003-05 within existing
revenues, and accounts that have large ending balances may have to be tapped.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Anna Arodzero
Office of House Speaker Karen Minnis
503.986.1210-Direct
503.986.1201-Fax
anna.arodzero@state.or.us
--- REPLY ---
HI-
Thanks for the reply. The balance in the account was derived from fees paid in accordance w/ statute, which dedicated those fees
only to the operation of the OMMP. I just spoke with Leg Fiscal office and they verified that funds derived from such fees, dedicated
to a certain purpose (as are the OMMP fees), and providing that the purpose receives no Gen Fund support, (as OMMP does not) the funds
can not be used lawfully for another purpose w/out a statute change regarding the dedicated purpose and the funds so affected are only those
future funds, no funds having been previously collected, expended or not, can be transferred.
If the fees themselves were dedicated for a single purpose, here the OMMP operation, and that purpose have lawfully made plans (by statute
and rule) for expending those funds I find no basis for the conclusion that the funds were eligible for transfer.
Again thank you for your reply, and I hope to hear from you further on this issue.
Xxxxx Xxxx
|
Example #8
--- HERE’s ONE WHO GETs IT! USE THESE POINTs in COMMUNICATING WITH OTHERS ---
Dear Mary,
Thanks for your comments on this issue. Representative Roblan always enjoys hearing from consituents on issues that are important
to them.
The Representative understands the concerns you have about HB 5077; however, he is still looking in to the specifics of this bill. In
general, Representative Roblan disagrees with the idea of taking money from a non-general fund program to free up more money for the
general fund. He agrees with you that the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program should not be raided for the one-time benefit of more
money this biennium.
I will place your comments in the Representative's HB 5077 file so that he can take them into consideration.
Thanks again for your comments. If you have any further questions or concerns, you are always welcome to contact our office.
Matt Lehman
Legislative Aide to Rep. Arnie Roblan, HD 9
503.986.1409
www.leg.state.or.us/roblan
|
Example #9
I am writing you, as the first person in Oregon to recieve a medical marijuana permit, to vote NO on HB5077.
It is unfortunate that the state sees fit to take $900,00.00 from the OMMP. This is not tax collected money, but funds
collected from the permits paid for by sick and disabled people. IT IS NOT GENERAL FUND MONEY!!!!!!!!
The money needs to stay in the OMMP so that fees for the sick can stay at a reasonable amount, and so that people will be
able to get the medicine that the need.
Please vote no on this bill and so do the right thing for those that need your voice.
Thanks so much,
Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx
|
Example #10
Dear Xxxx,
Thank you for the information. I will make sure
Senator Nelson receives it.
Sincerely,
Jesse Lohrke
Assistant to Senator David Nelson Dist. 29
900 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97301
(503) 986-1729
-----Original Message-----
Vote NO on HB 5077
Dear Official,
OMMA gives permission to grow medical marijuana. There
are 10,000 patients currently registered under this
program. The OMMA program has a value of about one
million dollars. The number one problem that seems to
exist is our impatient law enforcement agencies. When
a patient shows their official marijauna card some
impatient agencies want instant
verification. We want our card to be acknowledged. We
are patiently negotiating with law enforcement and
legislators who do not think our official registry
cards are enough for them at any given moment. I
think it is totally unfair. Patients have paid almost
a million dollars for a registry card that does not
satisfy the officials. The Official Medical Marijuana
Program needs the million dollars to prove to the
officials of Oregon that patients are willing to
register into the program and use all that money to
pay the officials to verify the official cards for the
patients and the official cards for the caregivers
every second of every day that their cards allow them
their medical right to possess or grow medical
marijuana based on our medical marijuana laws.
Please do not steal the million dollars and force OMMP
into a fee increase simply to operate. Please be fair
and leave OMMP and its bank account alone.
Vote NO on HB 5077 so the OMMP is not forced into a
fee increase simply to operate. The LFO report has
faulty assumptions.
Grant K. HIGGINSON said this regarding an OMMP finance
information request:
"Thank you for your inquiry about Oregon Medical
Marijuana Program funds. When our registration program
started in May 1999, it was a "first of its kind" and
so we worked with program advocates to determine an
appropriate fee. Based on an estimate of 500 patients
and staffing needs for running a registry, we came up
with an annual fee of $150 per
patient.
Over the next few years the number of patients
increased dramatically and we established a
significant cash balance.
Because of this, in July 2003, we reduced fees for
renewals and established even lower fees for patients
who were low income (on the OR Health Plan, or SSI).
Still our cash balance continued to increase due
to increased numbers of registered patients * now over
10,000. So in January 2005, we implemented a new fee
schedule of $55 dollars for either an initial
application or a renewal, and provide a very reduced
fee of $20 for low income patients.
This fee level can't fully support the program. The
rationale behind this reduction was that with these
lower fees, our steady operating costs, and some
commitments to special projects (such as a 24/7
verification system), we would end up with a
reasonable cash balance at the end of the 2005-2007
biennium. We would likely have to raise fees again at
that time.
We have always told patients that they didn't need to
worry about the cash balance because our understanding
is that fee programs such as the OMMP could not be
used to subsidize other programs.
However, we were recently informed that LFO is
planning on utilizing $900,000 of our existing cash
balance to offset other budget priorities. I have
attached the relevant LFO document for your review.
The transfer is included in Increased Other Fund
Revenues of $3.2 million on page 7, and is spelled out
in more detail on page 8.
As I think you already know, the vehicle for making
such a fund transfer happen is HB 5077."
Vote NO on HB 5077 so the OMMP is not forced into a
fee increase simply to operate. The LFO report has
faulty assumptions.
Respectfully,
Xxxx X
|
Example #11
To: Rep.GaryHansen@state.or.us,
rep.jeffkropf@state.or.us,
rep.stevemarch@state.or.us,
rep.bradavakian@state.or.us,
rep.dennisrichardson@state.or.us,
rep.susanmorgan@state.or.us,
rep.gregsmith@state.or.us, rep.waynescott@state.or.us,
rep.genewhisnant@state.or.us,
repgregsmith@windwave.org
May 25, 2005
RE: HB 5077
Dear Representative,
Every Representative on the 2005 Joint Committee on
Ways and Means voted to raid the OMMP fund that was
dedicated by law for the purpose of OMMP operations.
OMMP fees were and are dedicated by statute for a
single purpose of the OMMP operation has lawfully made
plans by statute and rule for expending those funds.
The Oregon Legislature is a citizens legislature where
your cooperation with the citizens of Oregon and your
fair participation is essential.
I would like to ask you exactly how many of your
constitutiants urged you to vote yes on HB 5077 to
raid the OMMP fund. I am sure you must have had a few
letters and phone calls to urge you to vote NO.
Get back to me as soon as possible. I will be
contacting you in a few days.
Respectfully,
Xxxx X
|
LTEs -
Potheads in pain are gonna get ripped off by hotheads
in vain
Everyone at some time in their life will need
temporary relief from pain. Pain can be emotional,
physical, mental, or phantom pain. Marijuana is a
somewhat safe and very effective herbal remedy for
temporary pain relief. Marijuana is how I spell r e l
i e f. It is natural and easy to grow and very
popular. The truth about marijuana is not so popular.
The truth about marijuana has been hidden. The price
of hiding the truth from the population has been paid
for with the lives of our friends, family members, and
neighbors. Now the price of pot and politics is the
very funds that are needed to keep the Oregon state
registry system operating. Since there is a million
dollar marijuana fund our government wants to use the
wording of the law against the same community of
citizens the government already uses persuasive
misleading information.
Oregon has a state registry system for qualified
patients to pay a fee and send private personal
medical information signed by their physician to the
state. Maybe they are conducting a study at our
expense to see what kinds of people in our community
are requesting a right to self medicate of a natural
herb of their choice.
It took seven years for a
system that was projected to have 500 responsible
citizens with medical situations that our government
will possibly allow to grow, transport, and toke to
grow tooo over 10,000 registered users with a million
dollar fund. Maybe we do not know what our government
is planning on doing to the patients of OMMP but we
definitely know that our government is planning on
taking the OMMP million dollar fund. Patient
registration fees make the fund.
Only the fees
collected by patients conatribute to the OMMP fund.
Nothing else. The fees are dedicated by law but the
fund is not specifically worded when there is a
surplus above and beyond operating fees. Since the
words are not exact this leaves persuasive government
officials a loophole to raid these funds that are paid
by medical patients of Oregon. This fund is necessary
to protect the rights and lives of not only the
patients but also their families and their friends and
neighbors who care for them.
These 10,000 patients
and their friends, family, and neighbors have the
right to know that the funds that solely support the
OMMP are going to be raided while they are already
threatened to be raided by the federal government
based solely on their freedom of choice voted by
Oregon voters in 1998. The voters need to be made
fully aware that the medical marijuana patients are
not legally allowed to purchase their marijuana
medicine because it was not worded in the 1998 law
specifically allowing the sell or transfer of medical
marijuana in Oregon.
The officials are still trying
to raid the homes of marijuana patients and caregivers
by using an openended ammendment in a Senate Bill.
Senate Bill 772 will confuse the currently confusing
wording regarding the way gardens are supposed to
operate secretly while trying to keep the outside
environment from harming the growing of each patients'
marijuana. Senate Bill 772 will eliminate and change
the right to affirimative defence for the right to
medicate. That is not fair to people in pain. The
government should not try to negotiate the legal
rights to all individuals that are listed in our
Constitution for a right to medical treatment.
The
Constitution needs an ammendment for the medical
rights of Americans. All Americans. Equal medical
rights has been the sometimes silent war of the War
on Drugs. The officials of Oregon are trying to take
a million dollar marijuana fund that solely operates
by only the fees paid by medical patients of Oregon
that help save their lives in the midst of a federal
war on drugs on marijuana. There is also a supreme
court case in California that will effect the growth
of marijuana. We have drug judges that are also
influencing the medical rights of medical patients of
America. When we get equal rights and the war on
drugs stops then the drug judges can no longer effect
our medical rights.
OMMP needs their fund that is paid by patient fees to
stay in the OMMP fund. Please do not tear apart a law
that specifies that the fees are designated for the
operation of OMMP and take the funds for another
political system that failed. OMMP works. There is a
million dollars to prove that the money that goes into
the bank should stay in the bank and be withdrawn when
needed for that purpose it was put into the bank. Our
Social Security system could have made Americans
Millionaires. But our government took that money out
of that account on a word technicality and the future
of Social Security is a matter of national financial
insecurity. Please do not take the money away from
OMMP like they did Social Security. OMMP is an Oregon
State run system. Please do not follow the way the
federal run systems like Social Security are being
run. It does not work. Please leave the million
dollar marijuana money in the marijuana fund where it
belongs and is designated to go to by Oregon law.
The patients who paid into the million dollar
marijuana money deserve a right to know how easily
rewording a law can strip them from their rights and
from their money they voluntarialy contributed to a
fund that they all thought was protected by law. The
patients are already in pain. The patients just want
relief from pain. Please stop political greed. Help
enforce the rights of patients in need.
|
Please email yours or enter in the Bulletin Board.
MEDIA NOTEs
The committee work session time and the rally time, at least the main, press
related part, should NOT occur at the same time.
A uniform, clear, simple and sympathetic message must be at the core of any media outreach. Uniform because you can confuse the
media's understanding of what is important by a bunch of people saying a variety of things instead of the one main thing.
Clear, because our friends, the reporters can get confused abut things relating to mmj,as we know, and if they are they public is not educated
but confused as well.
Simple, because 1) see above and 2) time and space is limited for our story.
Sympathetic, (well duh?!?) and sympathetic approaches do best without overt attacks on another person or persons or questions of individual
motives of the legislators involved. Showing our pain and suffering is good. Being seen as obviously trying to cause some
sort of pain and suffering on another is bad.
I know all that is possible with a concerted effort at community which seems to be starting. I do sincerely appreciate fresher faces
with unfamiliar stories stepping up and taking the lead on things like this. I may know my way around the building better than many,
but the floor plan is simple and people tend to stick around for long enough to get to know them. I look
forward to having a lot more company on the rounds there.
This closing thought. That place is like 3-D matrix chess, but the pieces move only if you convince them to.
Make it emotional and peaceful in spirit and factual
in order to reach the minds of peaceful truth seeking
agreable citizens. Make people want to agree with you
so they can be more positive and influential. People
want to listen to what will effect them personally.
Some people just want to listen to the truth.
Tell them everything everyone wants rather than
everything that went wrong. More people can help when
you tell them things that are terrible with a way out.
Less people can help when you tell them terrible
things and no way out.
Keep it positive with a way out. Even when the way
out is not the way everybody wants. Empower the
people with the truth and a hope to solve problems
together in a peaceful manner.
Questions? Comments?
Need some info?
Got some info?
E-Mail us or
visit the Bulletin Board for further comments on this bill -or- to
post your own.
Link Summary:
For reference, tools, etc.
-
Here is the
OMMP financial report as of 31 December 2004.
It is in PDF and was scanned using updated Norton anti-virus.
This may help you know what HB 5077 is targeting. Look for "Cash Balance Ending" at
the bottom.
Text of the Bill
-
Click here for
WORD doc for viewing, downloading and printing.
-
Click here for
TEXT (txt) file / version.
-
Click here for
HTML web page version.
-
Click here for
PDF version.
-
Index to Bills. Your Legislation Station.
|